Setyoufreenews.blogspot.com

Paul Driessen writes, "As EPA ramps up its campaign to enlist religious, minority and other groups to support its mercury and air toxics rules, it is important that someone really clear the air by responding to the disinformation about these pollutants and explaining how these rules will hammer America’s economic, employment and healthcare systems, for few or no health or environmental benefits. This commentary seeks to do that by building on the articles that Dr. Willie Soon and I recently wrote." (Double left click on image for full story).

Google images

ONE MAN'S OPINION: Jim Gschwind, The Despondent Correspondent, sounds off on  "green" influence on the Republican Establishment this election year. We all are well aware that the “establishment” Republicans prefer not to rock the boat especially with such a huge financial sector of the economy as “green” industries.  These new industrial powers are donating vast sums of money to ensure future politicians and representatives DO NOT attempt to reverse this large industrial trend toward unstable “green” economy.   Unknown to most observers….a large portion of the US economy has been “hi-jacked” by the “greenies” and they are hauling in grants, loans and inordinate amounts of cash, hand over fist. (Double left click on imagefor full story).

Courtesy; Politically-confused.blogspot.com

With the Japanese earthquake which was underwater although close to shore but very deep and earth-oriented we know the following:  A fissure (crack) 78 miles wide and over 150 miles long was formed in the ocean floor in the Pacific and Japan moved 8-10 feet, a massive shift of land mass to be sure.  Scientists already are saying it caused a speed increase of .016 of a second of the earth’s rotation, and we don't know yet the effect of the tilt and wobble rotation on the earth.  The Pacific Plate slid up to 50 feet under the North American Plate. (Click on image for full story).

By Jim Gschwind  

Courtesy/Climatechangedispatch.com

The National Academy Working Group and other notable scientists have finally done the right thing by denouncing the viability of ethanol as a substitute for increasing gasoline prices.  Al Gore has even come out and said that he “regretted endorsing ethanol” after finding out more about it.  Trouble now is that all government agencies are on the bandwagon as well as congress and to turn around or stop what started out to be a “good thing” and redirect our efforts is probably a worse scenario than turning an aircraft carrier around in less than 50 feet, but we have to try.  Nobody thought about the law of “unintended consequences” but saw the “quick fix” only as a good thing for American farmers (it turned out it wasn’t good for all farmers either) and the American people.

By Jim Gschwind, Phd

etftrends.com

Given the obstacles natural to any paradigm shift as sweeping as that of the environmental movement, it's not surprising that misconceptions abound as to not only the benefits and working particulars of sustainable development but also to their merits apart from the larger debate over man-made global warming.

By G.M. Corrigan